Tag Archives: M1

The Mint Money Supply Digest for June 17, 2013

6/17/2013 Portland, Oregon – Pop in your mints…

Over the past week the M1 money supply has come roaring back from its relative collapse over the prior two weeks.  Today, the measure sits at $2.6 trillion.

For the uninitiated, the M1 and M2 Money supply measures, published on a weekly basis by the Federal Reserve, are defined as the following:

M1 consists of (1) currency outside the U.S. Treasury, Federal Reserve Banks, and the vaults of depository institutions; (2) traveler’s checks of nonbank issuers; (3) demand deposits at commercial banks (excluding those amounts held by depository institutions, the U.S. government, and foreign banks and official institutions) less cash items in the process of collection and Federal Reserve float; and (4) other checkable deposits (OCDs), consisting of negotiable order of withdrawal (NOW) and automatic transfer service (ATS) accounts at depository institutions, credit union share draft accounts, and demand deposits at thrift institutions. Seasonally adjusted M1 is constructed by summing currency, traveler’s checks, demand deposits, and OCDs, each seasonally adjusted separately.

M2 consists of M1 plus (1) savings deposits (including money market deposit accounts); (2) small-denomination time deposits (time deposits in amounts of less than $100,000), less individual retirement account (IRA) and Keogh balances at depository institutions; and (3) balances in retail money market mutual funds, less IRA and Keogh balances at money market mutual funds. Seasonally adjusted M2 is constructed by summing savings deposits, small-denomination time deposits, and retail money funds, each seasonally adjusted separately, and adding this result to seasonally adjusted M1.

In layman’s terms, the M1 Money supply is what we refer to as “Money on the street,” or cold hard cash.  It is the part of the money supply that is otherwise unencumbered or loaned out on float.

The M2 Money supply is perhaps best defined as the Money on the street (M1) plus all of the money that customers think is held at banks but is really loaned out.

In the past, the Federal Reserve also published the M3 (Broad) Money supply measure, which was essentially all of the money that customers had, thought they had, and/or thought that they could receive (via the inclusion of money market funds and repo instruments).  It was perhaps the truest measure of the money circulating in an economy  in aggregate.  In addition to base money, demand deposits, and time deposits, M3 included what the largest treasuries were holding in quasi money instruments . The Federal Reserve stopped publishing the measure on  March 23, 2006 as it began to launch into the stratosphere.

While the Broad money supply (M3) may have crossed the line into credit instruments {Editor’s Note:  Here at The Mint we recognize all Central Bank notes as credit instruments by definition}, it was an excellent proxy for inflation, for it gave demonstrated the sum total of how many players were participating in the game of monetary musical chairs that the banks and large treasuries play every evening when they settle up.

The M2/M1 Ratio

Today, we submit for your perusal, a graphic of the M2 Money supply divided by the M1 Money supply (the M2/M1 Ratio) by month for the data sets since January 1, 1959, the first year that the data is easily retrievable, through the first week of June.

Historical Ratio of M2 / M1 Money Supply Measures
Historical Ratio of M2 / M1 Money Supply Measures

For purposes of interpretation, the chart shows the degree to which the M1 Money supply is “leveraged” by commercial banks to create what is reported in the M2 figures.  Bear in mind this ratio is a function of both bank reserve requirements and consumer behavior.  Generally speaking, the M1 and M2 Money supply measures have been increasing over the span of the chart.

The ratio between them, however, has been on a general increase as well, meaning that the M1 measure has been leveraged.  This leverage appears to have peaked around 5.4 during the meltdown of late 2008 and early 2009.  Ever since then, it has been on a steady decline and currently stands at 4, just a shade above the straight average of 3.7 for the entire data set.

At a glance, it would appear that the economy, in terms of the M2/M1 ratio, is returning to a healthy balance.  In practice, this means that the game of musical chairs that occurs at the Fed settlement each night is a bit less stressful for the participants.

Unfortunately, this ratio appears to be historical with little predictive value save that perhaps a ratio of 5/1 being an indication that the monetary base is overextended.

For the moment, with the downward trend in the ratio intact, it appears that the monetary base that the Federal Reserve has gone to great pains to pad via its QE programs, is intact and ready to support an increase in economic activity.  Howver, one must keep in the back of their mind that the money supply itself is fragile, and if confidence in the Fed were to evaporate, all bets are off.

Stay tuned and Trust Jesus.

Stay Fresh!

David Mint

Email: davidminteconomics@gmail.com

Key Indicators for June 17, 2013

Copper Price per Lb: $3.19
Oil Price per Barrel:  $97.78
Corn Price per Bushel:  $6.68
10 Yr US Treasury Bond:  2.17%
Mt Gox Bitcoin price in US:  $106.99
FED Target Rate:  0.09%  ON AUTOPILOT, THE FED IS DEAD!
Gold Price Per Ounce:  $1,385 THE GOLD RUSH IS ON HOLD FOR THE SUMMER!
MINT Perceived Target Rate*:  0.25%
Unemployment Rate:  7.6%
Inflation Rate (CPI):  -0.4%
Dow Jones Industrial Average:  15,180
M1 Monetary Base:  $2,634,300,000,000
M2 Monetary Base:  $10,586,200,000,000

The currency war to end all currency wars

1/28/2013 Portland, Oregon – Pop in your mints…

With Japan’s recent aggressive devaluation of the Yen, the financial news has again taken up the phrase “currency war” to describe any lack of coordination in the steady devaluation of fiat currencies across the globe.

In a recent piece over at the Financial Times, Niall Ferguson identifies the Bank of England as the current winner in the stealth currency war that is currently being waged.  While the Bank of England may be the winner, the losers are not other nations, as the term war would suggest, but rather the savings of those who are unfortunate to count bank accounts or debt instruments denominated in national currencies among their assets.

Who, then, are the winners in what we have dubbed the currency war to end all currency wars?  In a simplified sense, those who hold the Dow Jones Industrial stock index (not the individual stocks, which are, in the final analysis, a crap shoot) and those who own gold.

In an attempt to illustrate this point while at the same time saving 1,000 words, should the old adage hold true, we have created the following graph, which plots a normalization (which brings the sheer magnitude of the numbers down to a workable scale) of the M1 and M2 monetary measures against both the Dow Jones Industrial Average and gold prices, all averaged on a monthly basis since April of 1968.

Graph of Normalized DJIA and Gold assets classes vs. M1, M2, and Federal Funds Rate measures
Graph of normalized DJIA and Gold assets classes vs. M1, M2, and Federal Funds Rate measures

Those with a keen eye will notice that the only data point that has been on a downward trend since the US Dollar was officially released from the shackles of the gold standard on August 15, 1971 has been the Federal Funds Rate, which in theory should have an inverse relationship with all of the other data points.

We will leave you with three observations from our graphic exercise:

1.  The most volatile of the two asset data sets has been that of the Dow Jones Industrial Average.  However, despite its volatility, its overall trend tends to follow that of the M2, or expanded, money supply measure.

2.  The more stable of the two asset data sets has been gold, which has generally lagged growth in the M1, or base money supply to which it was tied to pre 1971.  Beginning in the year 2000, gold again began to follow the M1 trend.

3.  The light blue line, which tracks the Federal Funds Rate, has been on a downtrend.  The upticks in the Federal Funds Rate, in theory, should have lead to downward ticks in the M1 and M2   As you can see from the graph, this is not the case.

The conclusion of this brief analysis is the following:  Holding Stock Indices such as the Dow Jones should give some measure of protection against inflation over the long term, perhaps even superior to gold.  However, since 2000, gold has held steady as an inflation hedge and generally will have less liquidity risk than stocks.

Finally, and perhaps most importantly, is that upwards changes in the Federal Funds rate, even those as dramatic as were experienced during the Volcker years, have little or no effect on the near term trajectory of the M1 and M2 monetary measures and have never caused these monetary measures to trend downwards, ever.  At most, these movements may serve to temporarily arrest the upwards slope of the growth of the M1 and M2 monetary measures.

What does it mean?  While the Federal Funds Rate may serve to weakly toggle the rise in the M1 and M2 measures, the Quantitative easing programs, which began in 2008 and are now a permanent piece of monetary policy, have had a much greater direct impact on both the monetary measures and the asset classes which have been included above.

Given the current state of affairs, the QE program must be watched closely as it will have an outsized immediate impact on asset prices.

In the long run, it is clear that the Federal Reserve has set monetary policy on autopilot and programmed a course straight through the stratosphere and into the far reaches of outer space.  There is no plan for the US Dollar to return to earth.  The M1 and M2 monetary measures will not come down, no matter what happens to QE and the Federal Funds Rate.

It is time to organize investments in the real world accordingly.

Stay tuned and Trust Jesus.

Stay Fresh!

David Mint

Email: davidminteconomics@gmail.com

Key Indicators for January 28 2013

Copper Price per Lb: $3.64
Oil Price per Barrel:  $96.52
Corn Price per Bushel:  $7.29
10 Yr US Treasury Bond:  1.97%
FED Target Rate:  0.15%  ON AUTOPILOT, THE FED IS DEAD!
Gold Price Per Ounce:  $1,659 THE GOLD RUSH IS ON!
MINT Perceived Target Rate*:  0.25%
Unemployment Rate:  7.8%
Inflation Rate (CPI):  0.0%
Dow Jones Industrial Average:  13,881
M1 Monetary Base:  $2,397,900,000,000 LOTS OF DOUGH ON THE STREET!
M2 Monetary Base:  $10,501,100,000,000